
Why growing faster makes the cash worse
A business can be profitable on every line and still run dry, and growing quickly is what does it. Where the money actually goes, the two numbers that tell you how long you can keep it up, and what a credit team makes of them.
It is the most common question a business owner asks an accountant, and it almost never gets a satisfying answer. The profit and loss says the business made money. The bank statement says otherwise. Both are correct, and the gap between them is not an accounting trick or a mistake in the books.
Profit counts a sale on the day you make it. Cash counts it on the day you are paid. Between those two dates the money is real but it is not yours yet, and in the meantime you have already bought the stock, paid the staff and covered the rent. That gap is called working capital, and every growing business funds it out of its own pocket whether it planned to or not.
Where the money actually goes
Three things move between one balance sheet and the next. Two of them take cash out and one puts it back, and once you can see them separately the mystery stops being mysterious.
| What moved | What it does to cash | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stock on hand goes up | Takes cash out | You have paid for goods that are still sitting on a shelf. Nothing has come back yet. |
| Owed to you goes up | Takes cash out | You have done the work and issued the invoice. The money is in someone else's account. |
| Owed by you goes up | Puts cash in | A supplier waiting to be paid is lending you money, whether either of you framed it that way. |
Add the first two and subtract the third, and you have the amount working capital consumed over the year. Take that off profit, add back depreciation because no money left the building for it, and what remains is the cash the business actually produced.
A worked example
A business reports $200,000 of operating profit and $50,000 of depreciation. On the face of it, $250,000 of cash generated. Over the same year stock rose by $70,000, the amount customers owed rose by $80,000, and the business paid its own suppliers down by $30,000.
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Operating profit | $200,000 |
| Add back depreciation | $50,000 |
| Less: stock went up | −$70,000 |
| Less: customers owed more | −$80,000 |
| Less: suppliers paid down | −$30,000 |
| Cash the business actually made | $70,000 |
Working capital absorbed $180,000, which is 90% of the reported profit. Nothing here is a loss and nothing has gone wrong.
The owner of that business has had a good year by every measure their accountant reports, and has $70,000 to show for $200,000 of profit. If they also paid tax on the $200,000, took drawings, and made loan repayments, they finished the year further behind than they started.
The uncomfortable part: this is what success looks like. A business that grew 30% and tied up $180,000 doing it has done nothing wrong. It has simply funded its own growth, and nobody told it that is what it was signing up for.
Why growth makes it worse, not better
Every extra dollar of sales needs stock bought before it can be sold, and turns into an invoice that sits unpaid for a month or two after it is. So the faster you grow, the more you are carrying at any moment, and the gap widens rather than closing.
This is why businesses fail in good years. A downturn is visible: sales drop, everyone notices, decisions get made. Growth is invisible in the same way a slow leak is. Every report looks strong right up until the day a supplier payment bounces.
The two numbers worth watching
First, whether working capital is absorbing more than the business earns. Absorbing some is normal and healthy. Absorbing more than operating profit plus depreciation means the business is consuming cash to stay open, and that has to be funded from somewhere: savings, a facility, or by slowing down.
Second, how long your money is somewhere else. Add the days your stock sits before selling to the days your customers take to pay, then subtract the days you take to pay your own suppliers. That is your cash conversion cycle, and every day of it is a day you are funding.
| If you | It releases |
|---|---|
| Collect ten days faster | About $55,000 |
| Hold one week less stock | About $21,000 |
| Take an extra week to pay suppliers | About $21,000, borrowed from them |
Debtor days run against revenue, so one day is about $5,500 on $2m. Stock and creditor days run against cost of sales, so on a 55% cost of sales one day is about $3,000. Multiply by the days you move and that is the cash, before you borrow a cent.
What to do about it
- Work out what your customers actually take to pay, not what your invoices say. The gap between those two, times your daily revenue, is money you have already earned and are lending out for free.
- Chase it before you borrow against it. Collecting to your own stated terms costs nothing but phone calls, and it is the cheapest funding a business will ever find.
- Look at stock the same way. Slow-moving lines are cash sitting on a shelf, and the shelf does not pay interest.
- Negotiate supplier terms deliberately rather than by drifting late. Agreed terms are funding. Unagreed lateness is a reference problem, and lenders read it as one.
- If the gap is structural rather than fixable, fund it deliberately. A facility arranged in advance costs far less than one arranged in a hurry.
What a lender sees
A credit team compares profit to operating cash flow as a matter of routine, and a business where the two diverge badly gets questions. Not because it is doing anything wrong, but because a lender is trying to work out whether the profit is real and whether the business can service debt out of it.
Being able to explain the gap before you are asked changes that conversation completely. It is the difference between a file that looks like it has a problem and one that looks like it is being run by someone who understands their own numbers.
General information only. It does not take your objectives, financial situation or needs into account, and it is not credit, tax or financial product advice. Figures are illustrative. Finance is arranged through The Lending Lab Pty Ltd (ACN 651 936 337), Credit Representative 538291. Nicholas Clunes is Credit Representative 530711. Both are authorised under Australian Credit Licence 387856.
Keep reading
All insights- How to prepare a cash flow forecast for a bankThis explains the year gone. A forecast projects the one coming.
- Profit First in Australia: does it survive BAS?
- Simple Numbers review: are you really making a profit?
- The cash conversion cycle, with an Australian example
Bring the numbers you have. You'll leave with a clear answer and a fee in writing.